The High Court dismissed a writ petition and disposed of a connected civil application in default as the petitioner did not appear and was deemed uninterested in prosecuting the matter.
Writ petition dismissed in default; connected civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mhi
WP-1817-14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1817 OF 2014
Rupa Associates
Petitioner
Versus
City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1817 OF 2014
Shri Yeshwant Janardhan Bhagat Applicant
In the matter of : M/s. Rupa Associates Petitioner vs.
Panvel Municipal Council & Ors. Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. S.M.Kamble for the applicant. Mrs. M.P.Thakur, AGP, for the State. Ms. Akansha Helaskar i/b. Mr. A.M.Kulkarni for CIDCO.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ. DATE :5th April, 2018.
P.C. :
None appears for the petitioner. On the last occasion also nobody appeared for the petitioner when the matter was
Mhi
WP-1817-14.doc
2
called out on 1.3.2018. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed in default. Civil Application stands disposed of.
[SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE,J.]
M/s. Rupa Associates
City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
Panvel Municipal Council
Ranjit More
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
