The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a municipal order and disposed of a consequential civil application, permitting a fresh petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7684 OF 2014 ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.132 OF 2016
Tejpal Chandulal Shah And Others … Petitioners Versus The District Collector, Kolhapur And Others … Respondents
… Respondents
Mr. P.B. Shah a/w Mr. Kayval P. Shah for the Petitioners. Mr. A.P. Shinde for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.
Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.7A(i), 7A(ii), 8(ii), 10(i), 10(ii), 11(i), 11(ii), 12(i) and 12(ii).
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 3 SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C. :
. Having regard to the order dated 25 April 2018 passed by Respondent Nos.4 and 5, Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, Ichalkaranji, Dist. Kolhapur, we are of the view that instead of allowing the Petitioner to amend the petition, we allow the Petitioner to withdraw the petition and file fresh petition challenging the said order and for other reliefs sought for in the present petition. All the contentions of the parties are kept open.
2 The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with the liberty as above.
2/2
Chittewan
[SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.]
[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
Digitally signed RajeshVasant by Rajesh VasantChittewanDate: Chittewan 2018.09.03 16:49:22 +0530
Tejpal Chandulal Shah
The District Collector, Kolhapur
Shantanu Kemkar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
