Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Va… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2018)

Home
Bombay HC
2018
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Va Ashangathit Kamgar SMaharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Va Ashangathit Kamgar Sanghatan

Disposed

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Va Ashangathit Kamgar Sanghatana Thr President N. S Mahale and Others v. the State of Maha. Labour, Industries and Engery Dept. Mantalya, Mumbai Thr Secrtary

Bombay HC2 Jul 2018CAW/1311/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur allowed an amendment to the prayer clause of the Civil Application in Writ Petition No. 1414 of 2016.

What did the court decide?

Amendment to the prayer clause by addition allowed. Liberty granted to file reply within two weeks.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Amendment to the prayer clause by addition allowed. Liberty granted to file reply within two weeks.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In a civil application arising from a writ petition, the High Court permitted the respondent No.3 to amend the prayer clause by addition of a prayer. The amendment was allowed by adding a further time limit for filing a reply to the amended prayer, after which the civil application was disposed of.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

1 caw1311.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1311 OF 2018 IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 1414 OF 2016

(MAHARASHTRA SURAKSHA RAKSHANK ..VS..STATE OF MAH. & OTH.)

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

Court's or Judge's orders

None for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.

Shri S.D. Ingole, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.

DATED : JULY 02, 2018.

Nobody for the petitioner.

The respondent No.3 is seeking time to file reply to Civil Application No. 1311 of 2018.

The amendment sought is addition of a prayer clause.

In this situation, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondent No.3, we allow the amendment. Necessary amendment be carried out within one week.

Liberty to the respondent No.3 to file appropriate reply to the amended prayer/ part within further period of two weeks.

The civil application is disposed of . No costs.

RRaut..

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak
respondent
State of Maharashtra
respondent
Respondent No.3

Coram

AI extract

B.P. Dharmadhikari
Z.A. Haq

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 2 Jul 2018 · July
Registered: 15 Jun 2018
Case no.: CAW/1311/2018
CNR: HCBM040171662018
Topic: Constitutional and Fundamental Rights
Bench: B. P. Dharmadhikari Z.a. Haq
Disposal: Admitted/Allwd/Granted/Rule Absolute

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B. P. Dharmadhikari Z.a. Haq

Hindustansecurity and Inteligence Service ,Thr.Its Manager Prqvin S/O Ramchandra Gulhane Vs the Assistant Labour Commissioner/Presiding Officer and Another
29 Jun 2018
Ganesh Pralhad Gaikwad Vs the Director, Directorate of Municipal Administration, Mumbai and 2 Others
29 Jun 2018
Yuva Jagruti Seva Sahakari Sanstha through Its Secretary Ajaykumar Subhashrao Hiwanj Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Employment and Self Employment Dept. Mumbai and Other
29 Jun 2018
Ms. Akanksha D/O Vinod Nitnaware Vs the State of Maharashtra, Dept. of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai Thr. Its Secretary and Other
2 Jul 2018
Agrawal Bichhayat Kendra, Nagpur through Its Proprietor, Nirmaladevi Omprakash Agrawal Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Public Works, Mumbai and Others
2 Jul 2018
Ku. Dnyaneshwari D/O Chaitram Dhote Vs State of Maha. Thr. Its Secretary, Rural Development and Water Resources Dept. Mumbai and Others
2 Jul 2018

Cite this judgement

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Va Ashangathit Kamgar Sanghatana Thr President N. S Mahale and Others v. the State of Maha. Labour, Industries and Engery Dept. Mantalya, Mumbai Thr Secrtary, CAW/1311/2018 (BOM), decided on 2 July 2018.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B.P. Dharmadhikari and Z.A. Haq

Parties & counsel