The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed Civil Application No.1239 of 2016. The period granted to the applicant (State) no.2 for deciding the caste claim of respondent no.3 was extended by three months.
Time granted to applicant no.2 to decide the caste claim of respondent no.3 extended by three months
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-1239-16.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1239 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9507 OF 2015
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Dilip Manglu Borse .. Respondent
Mr.P.G. Sawant, AGP for Applicant – State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2018.
P.C. :
For the reasons stated in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, we allow this application in terms of prayer Clause (a). Time granted to applicant no.2 to decide the caste claim of respondent no.3 is extended by a period of three months from today.
2 Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Dilip Manglu Borse
Ranjit More
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
