This single-judge order allowed an intervener to be added as a respondent supporting the appellant in a second appeal and directed the impugned cause title regarding the parties.
The applicant/intervenor was added as a party respondent. The cause title was to be amended forthwith. The application was allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osk 503-cas-1580-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1580 OF 2017 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2016
| Niraj Krushpal Rathi | … | Applicant (Intervenor) |
|---|---|---|
| In the matter between : | ||
| Dagdu Balu Phatak | … | Appellant |
| V/s. | ||
| Aamby Valley Limited | … | Respondent |
CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATE : 3rd APRIL, 2018.
P.C. :
1] Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on production board. 2] By consent of the parties, the Civil Application No..1580 of 2017 is allowed and the Applicant/Intervenor Mr..Niraj Krushpal Rathi is added as party Respondent for supporting the Appellant.
3] In the present Second Appeal, the amendment in the cause title to be carried out forthwith.
4] The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
1/1
Niraj Krushpal Rathi
Dagdu Balu Phatak
Aamby Valley Limited
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
