Allowed
Suraj @ Suryakant Lolge v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Deputy Secretary, Mumbai and 3 Others
Bombay HCCAO/989/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca989.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 989 OF 2018 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 12 OF 2018
(SURYAKANT GAJANRAO LOLGE...VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. DY. SECRETARY & OTH.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri N.R.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Shri J.B.Kasat, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. Shri Amit Choube, Adv. h/f. Shri A.A.Naik, Adv. for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 20, 2018.
RRaut..
Suryakant Gajanrao Lolge
State of Maharashtra
Dy. Secretary
B.P. Dhar马达希卡里
Z.A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court