The High Court dismissed the civil application and family court appeal because the appellant failed to prosecute within six months of receiving case papers, deeming them not desirous of continuing the suit.
The civil application and family court appeal are disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1502cao224.18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.224/2018 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO.15570/2017
Sau. Vidya Vinod Ingale ...Versus...
Vinod Chantaman Ingale
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri U.J. Deshpande, Counsel for applicant
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATE : 15/02/2018
The learned Counsel for the applicant has tendered a pursis in the Court today. It is stated in the pursis that he has returned the entire case papers pertaining to this family court appeal to the appellant and the acknowledgment of the receipt is annexed to the pursis.
It appears from the acknowledgment that the case papers were returned to the applicant – appellant before nearly two months. It appears that the applicant has not engaged another Counsel and this shows that the applicant must not be desirous of prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, we dispose of the civil application as well as the family court appeal. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
Sau. Vidya Vinod Ingale
Vinod Chantaman Ingale
VASANTI A NAIK
ARUN D. UPADHYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
