Disposed

Smt. Gurabai Gurmukhdas Mattani and 4 Others v. Amravati Municipal Corporation through Commissioner Amravati

Bombay HC20 Feb 2018CAO/1769/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench allowed the applicants' civil application, condoning a six weeks' delay in filing for restoration of a writ petition dismissed due to lack of instructions. The order was recalled subject to payment of court costs.

What did the court decide?

The order dismissing the writ petition is recalled subject to payment of costs of Rs. 500 to the High Court Bar Association within one week.

Smt. Gurabai Gurmukhdas Mattani and 4 Others Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

CAO1769-17

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

C.A.O. NO.1769/2017 IN MCA ST. NO.16844/2017 IN W.P. NO. 2718/2013 (D) (GURABAI GURUMUKHDAS MATTANI & OTHERS VERSUS AMRAVATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AMRAVATI)

¶5

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - Shri S.S. Chavan, Advocate h/f Shri P.S. Khubalkar, counsel for the applicants. Shri S.S. Alaspurkar, counsel for the non-applicant.

¶8

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND

¶9

A.D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 20, 2018.

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the contents of the application.

¶11

Though the learned counsel for the non-applicant strongly opposes the prayer made in the application, for the reasons stated in the same, the delay of sixty days in filing the restoration application is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of.

¶12

M.C.A. ST. NO.16844/2017 .

¶13

Heard. Perused the contents of the application.

¶14

It is stated on behalf of the applicants that after the writ petition was dismissed, the applicants contacted the counsel and informed him that the writ petition should have been prosecuted. It is stated that at the relevant time since clear instructions were not available, the learned counsel had informed the Court that there were no instructions in the matter.

¶15

Since the writ petition needs to be decided on merits rather than dismissing the same for want of instructions, the order dismissing the writ petition needs to be recalled.

¶16

Hence, the miscellaneous civil application is allowed.

¶17

CAO1769-17

¶18

¶19

The order dated 03.05.2017 is hereby recalled subject to payment of costs of Rupees Five Hundred to the High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within one week. If the costs are paid and the writ petition is restored to file, the same may be listed for final hearing as per its turn.

¶20

The miscellaneous civil application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶21

JUDGE JUDGE

¶22

APTE

Smt. Gurabai Gurmukhdas Mattani and 4 Others v. Amravati Municipal Corporation through Commissioner Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Gurabai Gurmukhdas Mattani and 4 Others v. Amravati Municipal Corporation through Commissioner Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yunus Kha Dilawar Kha Pathan Vs Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division and Another

Devidas Narayan Ingle Vs State Bank of India Thr. Chairman, Bombay and Another

Shashimohan Sugamchand Tapadiya and 2 Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Sunil S/O Markandiji Palhale Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education, Mumbai and Others

Subash Deshmukh and Others Vs Western Coalfields Ltd. Thr. Area General Manger Chandrapur

Swarup S/O Suresh Rahangadale Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and Others