Counsel for the respondent-wife stated that parties settled before the Family Court. Due to non-appearance by the applicant, applications and appeal stood dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2) cam242-05.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.242 OF 2005 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.23877 OF 2005 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2005
Ajay Sayajirao Desai ..Applicant. V/s. Sou. Rajashree Ajay Desai ..Respondent.
..Respondent.
None for the Applicant.
Mr.H.P.Vyas for the Respondent.
CORAM: R.M.SAVANT AND NITIN W.SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 2, 2018
P.C.:-
None for the Applicant. The learned counsel Mr.Vyas for
the Respondent-wife states that the parties have reached a settlement before the Family Court. This probably explains why no appearance is put up on behalf of the Applicant. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the Respondent and considering the non appearance on behalf of the Applicant, all the applications and the
Family Court Appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution.
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. ) (R.M.SAVANT, J.)
Ajay Sayajirao Desai
Sou. Rajashree Ajay Desai
R.M.SAVANT
NITIN W.SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
