The Bombay High Court allowed the applicant's civil application No. 334 of 2018 to be withdrawn with liberty to file a review petition, expressly reserving all merit questions.
Civil application was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file Review Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-cac-334-2018.odt
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.334 OF 2018 IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.588 OF 2017
Prakash Theodore Bangera ] Applicant Vs. Elias Gasper Pereira ] Respondent
Mr. Ubaid Ahmed Ghawte, for Applicant. Mr. V.E. Pereira, for Respondent.
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.
Heard Mr. Ghawte, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pereira, learned Counsel for the respondent.
“On an extremely conservative estimate, if given out today, these premises cannot possibly fetch less than Rs. 4,500/- per month.”
1 of 2
917-cac-334-2018.odt
2 of 2
Prakash Theodore Bangera
Elias Gasper Pereira
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
