directions of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Accepting the statement of the learned Asstt. Solicitor General of India, the Division Bench of this Court directed the respondents to decide the application in accordance with law after giving personal hearing to the applicant in view of the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.159 of 2012 expeditiously and within a stipulated period of six months. Along with the present application copy of the said representation/application dated 24th November, 2014 is also placed on record at Exh.R-8 (page 57). By this application/representation, the petitioner raised his grievance and claimed Rs.50 Lakhs. The Chief Post Master General, Maharashtra Circle, Mumbai found that the grievance of the petitioner in respect of interest was already satisfied in view of the judicial orders and in these judicial orders there was no reference to state that the petitioner was subjected to victimization for which he was claiming the damages. The authority, namely, Chief Post Master General found no merit in the claim raised by the petitioner in the application and accordingly the application is rejected by the authority. It was submitted by the learned Counsel for Union of India that against this order of the authority, Writ Petition No.3018 of 2015 is filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration of this Court.
