This court allowed a civil application filed under a writ petition. An amendment necessary to comply with the application was ordered to be carried out within fourteen days. The application was disposed of.
Necessary amendment to be carried out within fourteen days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 672.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 672 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5794 OF 2017
Gayabai Kishan Shinde .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Anand V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. Vaishali N. Patil-Jadhav, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri M. N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND ARUN M. DHAVALE, JJ. DATE : 16TH JANUARY, 2018.
FINAL ORDER :
. Heard the learned counsel for respective parties. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. The civil application is disposed of.
[ARUN M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Jan. 17
Gayabai Kishan Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Arun M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
