Dismissed

Minakshi Umesh Joshi and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC2 May 2018CA/5925/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a civil application seeking withdrawal, the court allowed the application and permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition. The writ petition and the civil application were subsequently disposed of with the rule discharged and no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil application allowed; writ petition permitted to be withdrawn; both disposed of; rule discharged; no order as to costs.

Minakshi Umesh Joshi and Others Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

(Order) (1) W.P. No. 06592 of 2017 &

¶2

C.A. No. 05925 of 2018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

¶4

Writ Petition No. 06592 of 2017

¶5

With

¶6

Civil Application No. 05925 of 2018 (In Writ Petition No. 06592 of 2017)

¶7

District : Jalgaon

¶8

1.Sau. Minakshi Umesh Joshi,
Age : 43 years,
Occupation : Business &
 Agriculture,
R/o. 15, Jaynagar, Jalgaon.
2.Shri Vijaykumar Deepchand
Chordia (HUF),
Age : 58 years,
Occupation : Business &
 Agriculture,
R/o. Mahavir Society,
Adarsh Nagar,
Jalgaon - 425 001.
3.Shri Saurabh Mahendra Kothari,
Age : 33 years,
Occupation : Business &
 Agriculture,
R/o. "Ajay Smriti",
Suyog Colony,
Jalgaon - 425 001.
4.Shri Mahendra Ajayraj Kothari,.. Petitioners /
Age : 62 years, Applicants.
Occupation : Business &
 Agriculture,
R/o. "Ajay Smriti",
Suyog Colony,
Jalgaon - 425 001.
All the petitioners through
their General Power of
Attorney Holder,
Umesh Ramvilas Joshi,
Age : 44 years,
Occupation : Business,
R/o. 15, Jainagar, Jalgaon.

¶9

(Order) (2) W.P. No. 06592 of 2017 &

¶10

C.A. No. 05925 of 2018

¶11

versus

¶12

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

¶13

2. The Director of Town Planning Department, Pune.

¶14

3. The Deputy Director, Town Planning, Nashik Division, .. Respondents / Nashik. Non-applicants.

¶15

4. Assistant Director, Town Planning Department, Jalgaon.

¶16

5. Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon, Through its Commissioner.

¶17

6. Assistant Director, Town Planning, Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon.

¶18

7. The District Collector, Jalgaon.

¶19

...........

¶20

Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate, for the petitioners / applicants.

¶21

Mr. R.B. Bagul, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondent nos.01, 02, 03, 04 and 07 / non-applicant nos. 01, 02, 03, 04 and 07.

¶22

Ms. Kalyani Deshmukh, Advocate, holding for Mr. P.R. Patil, Advocate, for respondent no.05 / non-applicant no.05.

¶23

...........

¶24

C.A. No. 05925 of 2018

¶25

(Order) (3) W.P. No. 06592 of 2017 &

¶26

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
 SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

¶27

 DATE : 02ND MAY 2018

¶28

ORAL ORDER :

¶29

Heard.

¶30

02.By way of civil application no. 05925 of
2018, the applicants - petitioners seek withdrawal of
the writ petition. The grounds for seeking
withdrawal of the petition are mentioned in
paragraphs 03 and 04 of the application.

¶31

03.In view of the above referred facts, the
civil application is allowed. Resultantly, the writ
petition is permitted to be withdrawn. The civil
application and the writ petition both are disposed
of accordingly. Rule in the writ petition is
discharged with no order as to costs.

¶32

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( Prasanna B. Varale )
JUDGE JUDGE

¶33

...........

¶34

puranik / WP6592.17

Minakshi Umesh Joshi and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Minakshi Umesh Joshi and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh S/O. Ganesh Patil (C-10409) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kashinath Potanna Pitlewad (C-9590) Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shivraj Jivaraj Gaikwad and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Minakshi Umesh Joshi and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Barkya Navashya Gaikwad (C-8129) Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pradip Lalasaheb Bansode (C-10303) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.