The Single Judge condensed a 90-day delay in filing an appeal, registered the corresponding Civil Appeal, and directed the issuance of notice to respondents, waiving service for one respondent.
The delay of 90 days was condoned; the appeal was registered, and notice was issued to the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT AURANGABAD
979 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5862 OF 2018 IN FAST/8147/2018
M.S.R.T.C., THR DIV. CONTROLLER, MSRTC, JALGAON VERSUS
AMARSING RUPCHAND PARDESHI AND ORS
Advocate for Applicant : Shri M.K. Goyanka; Respondents No.1 & 2 – Served; Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar.
CORAM : P.R. BORA, J. Dated: October 17, 2018
PER COURT :
( P.R. BORA, J. )
ggp
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 90 days in filing the appeal warrants condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Whether the appeal should be registered and notice issued to respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.S.R.T.C., THR DIV. CONTROLLER, MSRTC, JALGAON
AMARSING RUPCHAND PARDESHI AND ORS
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
