The Court allowed the applicant's civil application seeking recall of the Registrar's order refusing writ registration. The delay was condoned, and the writ petition was restored to its original position.
Refusal order set aside, writ petition restored, applicant directed to remove objections within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Sr926CA4362.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4362 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION ST. NO. 22279 OF 2015 (Rejected Case No. 78/2016)
Sumitrabai W/o Purushottam Yadav
Applicant...
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents...
Mr Sanjay A. Wakure, Advocate for the applicant Mr V. S. Badakh, AGP for respondent/State
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JUNE, 2018.
PER COURT:-
2 Sr926CA4362.2018
objections within six weeks from today. In the event of failure, the order passed in the instant civil application shall be deemed to have
been recalled.
[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ R. M. BORDE ] JUDGE JUDGE
Punde
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application for recall of the Registrar's order refusing registration of the writ petition should be condoned?
Sumitrabai W/o Purushottam Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
A. M. Dharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
