In a company application, the single judge held the plea not maintainable because the company had already been ordered to be wound up and the applicant was not a party to proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
49.cal.353.2018.cp.890.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION (LODG.) NO. 353 OF 2018 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 890 OF 2015
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited .. Applicant In the matter between : Foseco India Limited .. Petitioner Vs. Tulsi Castings and Machining Limited .. Respondent
Mr.Charles De Souza a/w. Adv. Manaswi Agarwal and Ms. Sakshi Bhalla for applicant.
Mr.Mahendhar Aithe, company prosecutor for official liquidator present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 16TH JULY 2018
P.C.
The company has already ordered to be wound up. This application therefore is not maintainable. In any event, applicant is not a party to any of the proceedings in this Court.
Application dismissed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Shraddha Talekar PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application was maintainable given that the company had already been ordered to be wound up.
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited
Foseco India Limited
Tulsi Castings and Machining Limited
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
