Allowed
Kanchanbai Baburao Sukalkar v. Additional Commissioner Aurangabad and Others
Bombay HCCA/3867/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca-3867-18.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3867 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6966 0F 2017
Kanchanbai Baburao Sukalkar
.. Petitioner
versus
Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad and others
.. Respondents
Mr L. H. Kawale, Advocate holding for Mr K. J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Mr S.P.Tiwari, Asstt. Govt.Pleader for respondents no.1 to 3
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 28th August, 2018
ORDER :
stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
week, place the matter for hearing on 11-09-2018.
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH JUDGE
pnd/-
Kanchanbai Baburao Sukalkar
Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court