In this civil application, the High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed the application by consent of parties, listing underlying writ petitions for final hearing.
Civil Application allowed by consent; Writ Petitions listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
6ca2640o18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2640 OF 2018
IN WP/5145/2002
SULBHA TIKARAM CHOUDHARI
VERSUS
SUNITA PRABHAKAR PACHPANDE AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Applicant : Shri Chaudhary Vikramsingh T.. Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri K.V.Patil h/f Shri S.R.Barlinge. AGP for Respondent 4 : Shri V.S.Badakh.
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 05th March, 2018
Per Court:
1 Considering the fact that Writ Petition No.5145/2002 with Writ Petition No.4509/2003 are already listed for final hearing, this Civil Application is allowed by consent of the parties.
2 By convenience of the parties, list Writ Petition No.5145/2002
with Writ Petition No.4509/2003 for final hearing on 22.03.2018.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
SULBHA TIKARAM CHOUDHARI
SUNITA PRABHAKAR PACHPANDE AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
