The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the family appeal after the parties settled outside court and the appellant expressed lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal.
The appeal along with the Civil Application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2017 WITH CA/13390/2017 IN FCA/44/2017
Sunita Santosh Rithe.
...Appellant.
versus
Santosh Kishanrao Rithe.
...Respondent.
Mr.M.R.Andhale, Advocate, for appellant. Mr.Rahul R.Mote, Advocate, for respondent.
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: February 5th, 2018
P.C. :-
agp/
Sunita Santosh Rithe
Santosh Kishanrao Rithe
Sunil P. Deshmukh
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
