Disposed

M/S Emco Ltd. v. Union of India through Joint Secretary and Others

Bombay HC29 Oct 2018CA/13315/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the application where proceedings were dropped by authorities post-admission of appeal, rendering the appeal infructuous. The Court also ordered the return of the deposit made by the applicant.

What did the court decide?

Return of the amount deposited in this Court by the applicant/appellant.

What the court decided

M/S Emco Ltd. Vs Union of India through Joint Secretary and Others — Bombay HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

13315.18ca

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13315 OF 2018 IN/WITH

¶5

CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.15 OF 2013

¶6

M/s EMCO Ltd., N-104, Additional MIDC, Jalgaon, Maharashtra Having registered office at; F/5, Road No.28, Wagle Industries Estate, Thane 400 604

¶7

..APPLICANT/APPELLANT

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

The Union of India, Through Joint Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company affairs, Having his office at Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi

¶10

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, 3/4/5 Floor, 34 Jai Center, P. D. Mello Road, Poona Street, Masjid (East), Mumbai 400 009

¶11

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik, Kendriya Rajaswa Bhawan, Gadkari Chowk, Old Agra Road, Nasik – 422 002

¶12

..RESPONDENTS

¶13

Mr R. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant/appellant; Mrs Kalpalata Patil - Bharaswadkar, Advocate for respondents

¶14

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE

¶15

AND

¶16

SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

¶17

DATE : 29th October, 2018

13315.18ca

(2)

ORAL ORDER:

Heard Mr Deshmukh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/appellant and Mrs Bharaswadkar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

¶22

Mr Deshmukh invited our attention to certain factual aspects reflected in the present application, more particularly in para Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5. The sum and substance of the submission is, appeal was filed before this Court and the appellant, while submitting the appeal had not deposited the amount of pre-requisite deposit. The appeal was admitted by this Court on 23^rd December, 2013 considering the substantial question of law as formulated in para (a) of the appeal. Insofar as the interim relief is concerned, this Court permitted the appellant to deposit the amount equivalent to 50% of the duty amount which comes to around Rs.2.5 Lacs in this Court within a stipulated period of six weeks from the date of the order of this Court, without prejudice to the right and contentions raised by him in the appeal. The Division Bench then directed the tribunal to proceed with the appeal without insisting on pre-deposit of the amount before it.

¶23

Mr Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant invited our attention to the copy of receipt placed on record at Exh.'B' to submit that the applicant/appellant has deposited an amount of Rs. 2,93,206/- in this

¶24

13315.18ca

¶25

(3)

¶26

Court on 5^th February, 2014. He then invited our attention to the subsequent events, namely, orders passed by the authorities. On 10^th November, 2017, learned Member of the tribunal passed the order and remitted the matter back to the authority for fresh consideration. Learned Member, by assigning reasons passed the order i.e. the appeal was allowed by way of remand. Subsequently, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Nashik, on considering all the contentions raised by the parties, arrived at a conclusion that the proceedings initiated against the appellant is not sustainable and ultimately the order was passed on 29^th March, 2018 stating thus:-

¶27

“1. I order, in terms of subject remand order of Hon'ble CESTAT, WZB, Mumbai to drop the proceedings initiated vide the show cause notices issued under F. No. V(85)1504/EMCO/1/Adj/2011 dated 27.01.2011 to M/s. Emco Ltd., N-104, Additional MIDC, Jalgaon.

¶28

This order is passed without prejudice to any other action that may be taken against them under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder or under any other Law for the time being in force.”

¶29

Mr Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant, thus, submits that as the proceedings itself is dropped and this subsequent event post admission of the appeals now makes the appeal infructuous.

¶30

13315.18ca

¶31

(4)

¶32

Mrs Bharaswadkar, learned Counsel for the respondents fairly admits this position in view of the subsequent orders. Mr Deshmukh, then prays for return of the amount deposited in this Court in view of above referred facts.

¶33

In view of the submissions of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and in view of the reasons stated in the application, the civil application as well as Central Excise Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

¶34

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

¶35

sjk

M/S Emco Ltd. v. Union of India through Joint Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

M/S Emco Ltd. v. Union of India through Joint Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Pirajirao Boyale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra Gramin Bank Aurangabad through Its Chairman and Others Vs Nagorao Kamaji Bamne

The Commissioner of Income Tax Aurangabad Vs Jai Jawan Jai Kisan Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Latur

Nalge Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Partur through Its Director Umesh Bhaurao Nalge Vs Superintending Engineer and Another

Mirza Rauf Baig Mirza Shabbir Baig Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Babasaheb Kisan Raut Vs Ghansham Mangale