Vimal Rajendra Kakade and Ors. Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Administrative Officer M.P. Virat, Aurangabad and Anr.

Heard Shri Gandhi the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and Shri Rathi the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent – Insurance Company.

¶13

It was the specific defence raised by the appellant – Insurance Company that, the policy shown to be of the the offending vehicle was not in fact the policy of the said vehicle. It was also the specific defence that the fake cover note was produced on record. Certain evidence was also adduced on behalf of the Insurance Company in that regard. The same, however, has not been considered by the Tribunal and discarding the said evidence, the Tribunal has held the

¶14

2 11776.2018.CA.doc

¶15

Insurance Company liable for paying the amount of compensation. Shri Gandhi pointed out the observations made by the Tribunal in para nos.23 to 26 of its Judgment.

¶16

After having gone through the discussion so made and the grounds of objections raised in the memo of appeal, it appears to me that, entire evidence will have to be rescrutinized. The objections so raised by Insurance Company cannot be prima facie discarded. Ultimately, if it is noticed that the policy was fake, no liability may arise of the Insurance Company. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to accept the request made in the applications. Hence the following order.

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(i) Civil Applications for withdrawal of amount are rejected.

¶19

( P.R. BORA, J. )

¶20

ggp

Vimal Rajendra Kakade and Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Administrative Officer M.P. Virat, Aurangabad and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimal Rajendra Kakade and Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Administrative Officer M.P. Virat, Aurangabad and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Silabai Kaduba Binniwale and Ors. Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.., Thr Its Div. Manager, Aurangabad and Ors.

Parmeshwar Changdeo Sabale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhagwat Sahebrao Chede and Others Vs Shilabai Manikrao Kemdharne

Prabhakar Yedudas Kale (Died) Thr Lrs Chandrakant and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

M/S Vatan Textile Limited through Its Director Shafique Ahmed Khan Hasan Khan Vs the Union of India and Others

The State of Maharashtra Vs Shobhabai Laxman Pagore and Anr.