Civil Application filed by Commissioner of Central Excise allowed in terms of specific prayer clauses by two judges of Bombay HC Bench at Aurangabad.
Issue fresh notice to the company and its Directors, Shri. Anil Dattabhau Lingade & Sunil Dattabhau Lingade, returnable after six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Sr8CEA34.2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11631 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 34 OF 2015
Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Aurangabad.
Appellant...
Versus
Adinath Concast Pvt. Ltd. Respondent...
Ms Anagha Pedgaonkar h/f Mrs Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Advocate for the appellant
CORAM : P. B. VARALE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.
PER COURT :-
. Heard Ms Anagha Pedgaonkar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2 Sr8CEA34.2015
[ MANISH PITALE ] [ P. B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE
S
Punde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil application filed by the appellant is meritorious.
Whether to grant the prayers included in the application.
Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Aurangabad
Adinath Concast Pvt. Ltd.
P. B. VARALE
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
