Single judge allowed civil application for amendment in a writ petition on consents of respondent counsel within the respondents.
Civil application allowed for amendment within one week; paper book supplied; matter posted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10529 of 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4851 of 2018 Sahebrao Narayan Borde ...Petitioner VERSUS Shantabai W/o Harakchand Soni (died) through legal representatives and others ...Respondents
Mr P.S. Paranjape, Advocate for petitioner Mr B.A. Darak, Advocate for respondents No. 1/c and 1/d. Mr Narayan R. Gattani, respondent No.2/b in person.
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 16th August, 2018
ORDER :
( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ) JUDGE.
Madkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application for amendment of the writ petition should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sahebrao Narayan Borde
Shantabai W/o Harakchand Soni (died) through legal representatives
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
