In receipt of a bail application from Sachin Bharat Tiwade after trial commencement, the Court held that the prayer for enlargement under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was unnecessary and disposed of the application without consideration.
Bail application stands disposed of as the trial has commenced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18- BA 923 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION No. 923 OF 2018
Sachin Bharat Tiwade ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Vishal Laxman Kolekar for Applicant Mr. S.H. Yadav- APP ******
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATE: JULY 26, 2018
P.C.
present case the trial is commenced and the matter is posted for arguments
before the trial court.
Vaishali Digitally signedby Vaishali Anil Anil Tikam Date: 2018.07.27 Tikam 22:30:23 +0530
[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.]
1/1
V.A. Tikam
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be considered given that the trial has commenced.
Whether a post-commencement bail application deserves enlargement under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin Bharat Tiwade
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
