Bail application deemed infructuous as the applicant had already been granted statutory bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. on 28.03.2018 during the pendency of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 33-18
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2018
Manoj alias Pappu Thakur .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. P. R. Dave, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 10.04.2018
P.C.
. Learned counsel for the Applicant states that during the
pendency of this Application, the Applicant has been granted statutory baill under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. on 28.03.2018. In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives for consideration in this Application.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Manoj alias Pappu Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
