Allowed

Himmatsingh Chandansingh Ranavat v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC4 Apr 2018BA/259/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the applicant, Himmatsingh Chandansingh Ranavat, who is accused of murder. The High Court allowed the bail application noting the case relies on circumstantial evidence, lacks last-seen evidence, and the recovered knife was not blood-stained.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was enlarged on bail on executing a Personal Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to reporting to the police station and court, and not tampering with

Himmatsingh Chandansingh Ranavat Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

BA 259-18.doc

¶2

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2018

¶4

Himmatsingh Chandansingh Ranavat .Applicant

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent

¶7

Mr. S. R. Pawar, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. A. A. Takalkar, APP, for the Respondent – State

¶8

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 04.04.2018

¶9

P.C.

¶10

. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

By this Application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on

¶12

bail in connection with C. R. No. 60 of 2017 registered with the Jawahar Police Station, District - Palghar, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302 & 201 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Perused the charge-sheet. The Applicant is the brother of

¶14

the deceased – Mohansingh Ranavat. According to the prosecution, the incident took place on 11.07.2017. According to the prosecution, the Applicant and co-accused – Himmatsingh Ranavat had called the

¶15

1 of 3

¶16

BA 259-18.doc

¶17

deceased - Mohansingh Ranavat on the pretext of giving him Rs. 6,00,000/- for setting up a shop. It is alleged that the Applicant and coaccused - Himmatsingh Ranavat took the deceased in a car, forced him to consume alcohol and thereafter, the Applicant and co-accused - Himmatsingh Ranavat assaulted the deceased and committed his murder. Thereafter, the dead body of Mohansingh Ranavat was disposed off near the Jawahar – Dahanu Road. Accordingly, the Police Patil of the village lodged a complaint as against unknown person. During the course of investigation, the Applicant was arrested. The prosecution case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence. There is no evidence of last seen or any other circumstance as against the Applicant. As far as recovery of a knife is concerned, the said knife is not blood stained. The Applicant has been in custody since 15.07.2017. Investigation is complete & charge-sheet is filed.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed and the Applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms & conditions :-

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing PR Bond

¶21

in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

¶22

(ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the

¶23

2 of 3

¶24

BA 259-18.doc

¶25

concerned police station on the first Sunday of every month between

¶26

10:00 a. m. and 11:00 a. m. till the conclusion of the trial;

¶27

(iii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

¶28

(iv) The Applicant to cooperate with the conduct of the trial;

¶29

(v) The Applicant shall file an undertaking with regard to clauses (ii) to (iv), in the trial Court, within two weeks of his release;

¶30

(vi) If there are two consecutive defaults in either reporting to the police station or appearing before the trial Court, the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of Applicant's bail.

¶31

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

¶32

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶33

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

¶34

3 of 3

Himmatsingh Chandansingh Ranavat v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himmatsingh Chandansingh Ranavat v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Vishwanath Jha and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dheeraj Umashankar Shahu Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nagesh Pandurang Sonawale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sheetalaprasad Gangaprasad Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mukesh Mangilal Balotiya Vs the State of Maharashtra

Santosh Nanaji Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra