Allowed

Rajendraprasad Kedarmal Chaudhari v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC2 Apr 2018BA/146/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal bail application regarding offences under IPC Sections 409, 420, 511 and IT Act Section 72. The applicant was released on cash bail of Rs. 25,000 for six weeks to fulfil future PR bond requirements.

What did the court decide?

Release on cash bail of Rs. 25,000 for six weeks; direction to furnish PR Bond within six weeks.

Rajendraprasad Kedarmal Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheque Dishonour | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

BA 146-18.doc

¶2

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 146 OF 2018

¶4

Rajendraprasad Kedarmal Chaudhari

¶5

.Applicant

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent

¶8

Mr. S. G. Rajput, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. A. A. Takalkar, APP, for the Respondent – State

¶9

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 02.04.2018

¶10

P.C.

¶11

. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

By this Application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on

¶13

bail in connection with C. R. No. 144 of 2016 registered with the Vile Parle Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 511 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 72 of the Information Technology Act.

¶14

Perused the papers. According to the prosecution, co-

¶15

accused – Jayprakash Sharma, working as a Senior Relationship Manager with Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd. told his brother i. e.

¶16

1 of 3

¶17

BA 146-18.doc

¶18

absconding accused, to give the client code numbers and on receipt of the same, Jayprakash gave the said client code numbers to the Applicant, who used the said client code numbers and placed orders to purchase shares worth Rs. 49,94,600/- of Symbiox Investment and Trading Ltd., on 03.05.2016. As far as the Applicant is concerned, he is alleged to have used the three client code numbers and by impersonating the said persons placed orders. Co-accused - Jayprakash Sharma is alleged to have given the client code numbers to the Applicant. Admittedly, no money was parted. The Applicant is in custody since 20.11.2017. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet is filed. The Applicant has no antecedents.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed and the Applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms & conditions :-

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

(i) The Applicant be released on cash bail in the sum of

¶22

Rs. 25,000/- for a period of six weeks;

¶23

(ii) The Applicant shall furnish P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more local solvent sureties in the like amount, within a period of six weeks of his release on cash bail;

¶24

(iii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the

¶25

2 of 3

¶26

BA 146-18.doc

¶27

concerned police station on the 1^st Sunday of every month between

¶28

10:00 a. m. and 11:00 a. m. for a period of 12 months from the date of

¶29

his release;

¶30

(iv) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

¶31

(v) The Applicant to cooperate with the conduct of the trial;

¶32

(vi) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the trial Court, the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the Applicant's bail;

¶33

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

¶34

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶35

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

¶36

3 of 3

Rajendraprasad Kedarmal Chaudhari v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendraprasad Kedarmal Chaudhari v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kisan Shejwal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Hariprasad Nandappa Shetty Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ajay Lahu Mhatre Vs the State of Maharashtra

Saddam Asalam Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nagesh Hanumant Dhangar @ Kotari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Meraj Ashraf Abdul Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra