Allowed

Shyam Pandurang Tambe @ Savio Rodriks v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Jun 2018BA/100/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal bail application, the defendant sought release on bail in a case involving organized crime and arms charges. The court granted bail based on the principle of parity with co-accused who had already been released, noting their roles were same or similar.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail upon furnishing a PR Bond with sureties and complying with eight conditions regarding conduct, movement, and attendance.

Shyam Pandurang Tambe @ Savio Rodriks Vs the State of… — Money Laundering | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

39-ba100.17.sxw

¶2

ssm 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 100 OF 2017

¶6

Shyam Pandurang Tambe @ Savio Rodriks

¶7

….Applicant.

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent.

¶10

Mr. Pankaj Kavale for the Applicant. Mr. S.S.Hulke APP, for the Respondent-State.

¶11

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 19^th JUNE, 2018.

¶12

P.C.:-

¶13

This is an Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for bail in CR No.I-84 of 2012 dated 13 July, 2012 registered with Kopari Police Station, Thane under Sections 307, 143, 147, 149, 120(B) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) of MCOC Act, 1999, under Sections 3 read with 25(1)(b), 3(4) and 27(2) of Arms Act and under Sections 37(1) and 135 of the Bombay Police Act, now culminated into MCOC Case No.1 of 2013.

¶14

2 The Applicant is accused No. 8 in the present Crime. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant submitted that the co-

¶15

1/3

¶16

ssm 2 39-ba100.17.sxw

¶17

accused namely Manish Salve (Accused No. 13) and Rajesh Bhalerao (Accused No.6) have been directed to be released on bail by this Court by its Orders dated 30^th March, 2016. He submitted that, the Applicant has been attributed with same and/or similar role, as that has been assigned to the said accused and therefore, the Applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.

¶18

3 The learned APP fairly conceded to the said facts situation.

¶19

The Investigating Officer has filed an affidavit dated 15^th

¶20

June, 2018 wherein, the contention of the Applicant has not been disputed.

¶21

4 After perusing the record annexed to the Application and the entire charge sheet, this Court is of the considered view that, the role attributed to the Applicant in the present crime is same and/or similar to that has been assigned to co-accused Rajesh and Manish and therefore, the Applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.

¶22

5 In view of the above, the Applicant can be released on bail. Hence the following order:-

¶23

a) The Applicant shall be released on bail upon

2/3

39-ba100.17.sxw

ssm 3

furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with

¶28

one or two sureties in the like amount;

¶29

b) The Applicant shall not pressurize the complainant, victim and any other witness;

¶30

c) The Applicant shall not indulge into any criminal activity hereafter.

¶31

d) The Applicant shall make himself available and attend all Court dates;

¶32

e) The Applicant shall not abscond and furnish his telephone number and address to the police along with address proof.

¶33

f) The Applicant shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

¶34

g) In the event of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the Court for cancellation of bail.

¶35

6 Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶36

3/3

Shyam Pandurang Tambe @ Savio Rodriks v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Pandurang Tambe @ Savio Rodriks v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahejad Mustaq Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sunil Ratan Aher Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sudhir Chandraraj Kanojia and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aabid Mohd. Ali S/O Amir Mohd. Ali and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sanjaybhai Govindbhai Tanti Vs the State of Maharashtra

Maqsood Ahmed Nazir Ahmed Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra