Allowed

Taj Air Limited v. Danish Salahuddin Sultan

Bombay HC27 Apr 2018ARBAP/98/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, appointed Mr. Vishal Narichania as the sole arbitrator to decide disputes between Taj Air Ltd. and Danish Salahuddin Sultan. The appointment was made upon consent after the arbitrator submitted his disclosure under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Vishal Narichania as sole arbitrator; dispute resolution to be conducted in Mumbai; final award within six months.

Taj Air Limited Vs Danish Salahuddin Sultan — Specific Performance | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

arbap 98 of 2017 (604).sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2017

¶3

Taj Air Ltd.

¶4

versus
Danish Salahuddin Sultan

¶5

… Applicant

¶6

...
Respondent

¶7

Mr. S. Anchan, for Applicant.
Mr. Jacob Kadantot, for Respondent.

¶8

CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 27th APRIL, 2018

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. On 26th April, 2018 this Court passed the following order :

¶11

“1.Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Both the
parties agree that there exists an arbitration agreement between the
parties and the Court may proceed to appoint a sole Arbitrator to decide
the disputes between the Applicant and Respondent arising out of the
Training Agreement dated 7th September, 2012. In view thereof, I pass the
following order :

¶12

(i)The Court proposes to appoint Mr. Vishal Narichania,
Advocate, as the sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes between the
Applicant and Respondent arising out of the Training Agreement dated
7th September, 2012.

¶13

(ii) Mr. Vishal Narichania, Advocate shall submit his disclosure
under Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation
(Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016) on or before 27thApril, 2018.
(iii)Stand over to 27thApril, 2018.”

¶14

1/3

¶15

ssp

¶16

arbap 98 of 2017 (604).sxw

¶17

2.Today, the disclosure of Mr. Vishal Narichania, Advocate, under Section
11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as
amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, is tendered in
Court and the same is taken on record.

¶18

3.The Advocate for the parties state that they have gone through the said
disclosure and have no objection to the same. In view thereof, the following order is
passed by consent :

¶19

i.Mr. Vishal Narichania, Advocate, is appointed as the sole Arbitrator to
decide the disputes between the Applicant and Respondent arising out of the Training
Agreement dated 7th September, 2012.

¶20

ii.The parties and / or their Advocates shall appear before the learned
Arbitrator in his chambers on 28th April, 2018 at 11.00 a.m. and obtain necessary
directions.

¶21

ii.The learned Arbitrator shall endavour to pass his final Award within a
period of six months from today.

¶22

iv.The learned Arbitrator shall not grant any adjournment to either side unless
absolutely necessary.

¶23

v. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

¶24

vi.The cost of arbitration shall initially be borne by the parties equally.

¶25

vii.The venue of the arbitration shall be at Mumbai.

¶26

2/3

¶27

ssp

¶28

arbap 98 of 2017 (604).sxw

¶29

4. In view of this order, the above Arbitration Application is disposed off.

¶30

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

¶31

3/3

¶32

ssp

Taj Air Limited v. Danish Salahuddin Sultan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taj Air Limited v. Danish Salahuddin Sultan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daiwat C. Jhaveri and Advaita C. Jhaveri Vs Aakankssha Infrastructure and 2 Ors.

Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs Shahid Infra Group and Anr.

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Shahid Infra Group and Anr.

Interglobe Technologies Pvt.Ltd Vs the National Insurance Co.Ltd

Taj Air Limited Vs Vikram Rishipal Ruhil

Anj Turnkey Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Raycon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.