The single-judge bench disposed of writ petition no. 2433 of 2013 as infructuous because the underlying family court proceedings pending before the Family Court at Bandra were already dismissed on 14/07/2016.
Writ petition and connected criminal application disposed of; liberty to approach Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 906.2433.13 wp
ISM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2433 OF 2013 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2018
Ahsan Shafat Khan
.....Petitioner
V/s.
Samina Akhtar Baig Mirza and another
....Respondents
Mr. Javed Akhtar Khan for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai i/b Iram Sayed & Priji Jaiswal for respondent no. 1.
Mr. P. H. Gaikwad APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : MARCH 20, 2018.
P.C.
It is not in dispute that the proceedings Petition no. E-90 of
2011 pending before Family Court at Bandra was dismissed on 14/07/2016. That being so, the writ petition has rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
2 906.2433.13 wp
2 As the writ petition is disposed of, Criminal Application no. 24
of 2018, in my opinion, need not be gone into. As such, same is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Family Court for taking appropriate remedy and measures.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Ahsan Shafat Khan
Samina Akhtar Baig Mirza
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
