Sushma Anil Kamble v. the State of Maharashra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant and their counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1619 OF 2014
Sushma Anil Kamble.
… Applicant/Petitioner.
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents.
None for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State.
CORAM : S.C. Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ.
11 April, 2018.
P.C. :-
This is an application for restoration. When it was placed today, the Applicant and the Advocate are absent. Their names are correctly displayed on the board. The Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Prakash D. Naik, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)
Sushma Anil Kamble
State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court