Sangita Swapnil Patil v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
Extension of time to furnish sureties granted by six weeks from the date of the order.
Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
Extension of time to furnish sureties granted by six weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 /1 35-appp-42-18
Nalawade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO.42 OF 2018 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2628 OF 2017 Ms. Santiga S. Patil. ...Applicant. vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent.
Mr. Atul Umerkar i/by Nitin Sejpal for the applicant. Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM :A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th January, 2018
P.C.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time limit for furnishing sureties in an anticipatory bail matter should be extended.
Ms. Santiga S. Patil
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court