Criminal Application for bail was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant appeared without representation while the State had appeared before the court.
Criminal Application No. 38 of 2017 in Bail Application No. 683 of 2016 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-appp38.17.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.38 OF 2017 IN
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 683 OF 2016
Kumar Nambi Tewar
…..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
….Respondent.
None for the Applicant. Smt. Rutuja Ambekar APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2018.
P.C.:-
None appears for the Applicant. Dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Kumar Nambi Tewar
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
