The Court allowed the application by the first informant to be impleaded as respondent No. 2 in the underlying anticipatory bail case.
Direction to implead the first informant as respondent No. 2 and to amend the application within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appp.5-2018.doc
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2018 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2116 OF 2017
Azad Sadre Alam Shaikh
… Applicant
Mr. B.M. Tripathi for Intervener.
Ms. Divya Srivastav i/b Shehanaz Shaikh for Applicant in ABA 2116/2017. Mr. R.M. Pethe APP for State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 25th JANUARY 2018.
P.C.:
1] This is an application for intervention by the first informant in CR No.429 of 2017 registered with Nagpada Police Station, Mumbai dated 11.10.2017.
2] For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
3] Applicant in A.B.A. No.2116 of 2017 is directed to implead the first informant Azad Sadre Alam Shaikh as respondent No.2. Amendment be carried out within 2 weeks from today and an amended copy of the application be served upon the learned Advocate for the respondent No.2 within same stipulated period.
Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the intervention of the first informant in the criminal proceedings.
State
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
