Tarachand Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

This is an Application for relaxation of condition No. 6(iv) imposed upon the Applicant by an Order dated 8^th March 2017 passed by this Court. The said condition No.6(iv) reads as under:

¶16

“The applicants shall report to the Officer of the Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai every alternate day.”

¶17

2 The learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that,

¶18

since his release from jail, the Applicant is sincerely complying with the said condition and also attended all the dates before Trial Court.

¶19

He further submitted that, this Court has relaxed the same condition

¶20

1/2

¶21

ssm 2 28-appp119.18.doc

¶22

imposed upon co-accused Santosh Bhosale by an Order dated 26^th June 2018.

¶23

3 In view thereof and for the reasons mentioned in the Application, the said condition is hereby modified and the Applicant is hereinafter directed to attend the Officer of the Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai on every first Monday of the month between 11.00 a.m and 1.00 p.m till completion of the trial.

¶24

4 Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶25

2/2

Tarachand Shah v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarachand Shah v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddhant Harish Varma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ajay Parasnath Shukla Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rakhi Makhanlal Patra Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Ashok Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Tukaram Bhudhaji Rasal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anand Dinkar Pagare Vs the State of Maharashtra