The applicant withdrew the criminal application before this court, resulting in the order being disposed of as withdrawn and the rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 640 OF 2008.
TRIMBAK RAYBHAN MADAGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. M.S. Karad, h/f Mr.S.S.
Thombre
APP for respondent No. 1 : Mrs. D.S. Jape.
Advocate for respondent NO. 2 : Mr. V.D. Sapkal.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:06th July, 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the applicant on
instructions submits that he wants to withdraw the
application. Criminal Application is disposed of as
withdrawn. Rule stands discharged.
mkd
1/1
Trimbaik Raybhan Madage
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court