The single judge granted leave to appeal by condoning a 23-day delay for the applicant, hearing counsel on applicant's side in the absence of respondent No.1.
Delay of 23 days in filing application for leave to appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(25)APPLNNo.4662016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2016
Babu Krishnan
V/s.
Chetan Natwarlal Vasani & Anr. ... Respondents
Ms.Bhagyashri Mangale i/b. E. A. Sasi, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.P.H.Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 16th OCTOBER 2018.
P.C. :
1 This is an application for condonation of delay of 23 days in filing the application for leave to appeal.
2 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant. None appeared for respondent No.1 despite service. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears for the respondent No.2/State.
3 For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the application for leave to appeal is condoned.
4 The application is disposed of accordingly.
1/1
Gaikwad RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 23 days in filing the application for leave to appeal should be condoned.
Babu Krishnan
Chetan Natwarlal Vasani & Anr.
A.M.Badar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
