High Court Bombay dismissed four criminal bail applications for lack of prosecution by the applicant and his counsel.
Applications rejected for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(40)APPLNNos.339-340-341-342-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.340 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.341 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.342 OF 2016
Premnath Vitthal Shelke ... Applicant V/s. Arjun Pandurang Gurav & Anr. ... Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 25th OCTOBER 2018.
P.C. :
2 Hence, the applications are rejected for want of
prosecution.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
1/1
Gaikwad RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal bail applications be allowed in the absence of prosecution for the petitioner.
Premnath Vitthal Shelke
Arjun Pandurang Gurav & Anr.
A.M. Badar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
