This order holds that the criminal application is infructuous as proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 were already disposed off, thus dismissing the plea for transfer.
Criminal Application No.230 of 2015 disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.APPLN.230.2015
mst
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.230 OF 2015
Savita Mikhil Chate Aplicant versus Mikhil Prakash Chate and others Respondents Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders None for applicant. Mr.Ahirban Tripathy for respondent no.5. Mr.Rajan Salvi, APP, for State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 4th January 2018 PC :-
Learned counsel for respondent no.5 submits, on instructions, that the proceedings under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 which are sought to be transferred, are already disposed off. In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition. Criminal Application No.230 of 2015 has, therefore, become infructuous, and stands disposed of as such.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Savita Mikhil Chate
Mikhil Prakash Chate
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
