The High Court dismissed Criminal Public Interest Litigation No. 9 of 2013 and a related application, holding that proceedings should not remain pending after the Court appointed an Amicus Curiae to assist.
PIL No. 9 of 2013 and Criminal Application No. 44 of 2014 were dismissed and disposed of respectively.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vikrant 1/2 909-CRPIL-9-2013.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 9 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 9 OF 2013
Kanchandevi Sunderlal Kothari & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
... Respondents
None for the Petitioners. Mr. H. S. Venegaonkar for the Respondent-UOI.
CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 24, 2018.
P.C. :
vikrant 2/2 909-CRPIL-9-2013.odt
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Kanchandevi Sunderlal Kothari & Anr.
Union of India & Ors.
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
