incident to her mother. The prosecutrix has described the act of commission of rape by stating that 'xank dke fd;k ', apart from describing actually as to what happened on that day. Then, as per her statement, on one day of the year 2011, the appellant/accused took her to the house from the school, removed her clothes and did 'xank dke ' with her. Thereafter, he threatened her not to disclose the incident to her mother. The prosecutrix on this occasion has not stated as to what she meant by 'xank dke'. The prosecutrix/ P.W.No.1 further deposed that during Diwali vacation of the year 2011, the appellant/accused told her mother that his brother-inlaw has come to Pune from Dubai and had called him along with prosecutrix. Despite resistance by her mother, appellant/accused took her to Pune. He booked a room at Mukesh Lodge and committed rape on her. Apart from describing the actual incident, the prosecutrix once again narrated the incident by saying that the appellant/accused had done 'xank dke ' with her. She further deposed that when her mother telephonically called her father, her father falsely disclosed her that they are still undergoing journey by the bus. Thereafter, in the midnight, as stated by the prosecutrix, they went to the house of her aunt. On the next day morning, her mother made a telephonic call when her father was sleeping. Taking the opportunity, she told her mother that the appellant/accused had committed rape on her at the lodge. As per version of the prosecutrix then in the noon time, her mother repeatedly called her father i.e. appellant/accused and insisted
