In a criminal application, the high court directed the return of specific seized articles and papers belonging to the accused, noting that the motorcar had already been returned, and disposed of the application.
Return of papers, mobile phones, tablet, smartphone, and laptop to the applicant; direction to produce them if required for appeal disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(16)APPANo.6062016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.606 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1026 OF 2015
Jerit John Gregory ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Amin H. Solkar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 28th FEBRUARY 2018.
P.C. :
1 This is an application for return of properties.
2 Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant/ appellant/accused. He submits that the learned trial Court vide Judgment and Order dated 09/10/2015 passed in Sessions Case No.242 of 2013 had directed return of properties at Sr.Nos.10,12 and 14 in the operative portion of the Order to the applicant/ appellant/accused after period of the appeal is over. He submits
1/3
Gaikwad RD
(16)APPANo.6062016
that those articles are not in any way concerned in the crime in question and they are belonging to the applicant/appellant/ accused and, therefore, he is entitled for the same.
3 The learned APP opposed the application by contending that the Motorcar which is at Sr.No.14 in the operative portion of the Order had already been returned to the applicant.
4 I have carefully considered the rival submissions and also perused the impugned Judgment and Order of conviction and resultant sentence. On trial, it is held by the learned trial Court that the present applicant/appellant/accused had thrown acid on the person of the P.W.No.5 victim on 07/11/2012 by committing trespass on preparation of causing hurt to her and had confined her wrongfully along with her friend by bolting the outer door of the house.
5 The property which is sought to be released is comprising of papers in the name of the applicant/accused and his family members in the plastic cover seized from the bag of the accused, valuable articles like blackberry Mobile phone, white coloured blackberry Mobile Phone, I-pad with charger, Apple iPhone, silver coloured Apple laptop with charger apart from the seized car.
2/3
Gaikwad RD
(16)APPANo.6062016
6 The record does not reveal that in all these articles which are claimed back were used in commission of crime. However, the learned APP has stated that the Car has already been returned back to the present applicant/accused.
7 In this view of the matter, the following Order :
(iii) The application is disposed of accordingly.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
3/3
Gaikwad RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the properties seized and directed to be returned by the trial court should be released to the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jerit John Gregory
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
