The court heard objections regarding delay in filing a condonation application for Criminal Appeal (St) No. 380 of 2018. Finding the delay condonable in the interest of justice, the single judge disposed of the application.
Delay in preferring Criminal Appeal (St) No. 380 of 2018 was condoned and the application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15b. cri appa 55418.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 554 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 380 OF 2018
Sunil Zumbarya Kale @ Bapu
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
| Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar | Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant |
|---|---|
| Mr. Arfan Sait | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, Acting C.J. &
M.S. SONAK, J.
DATE : APRIL 16, 2018.
P.C.:
1. Heard both sides.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay caused in
preferring Cri. Appeal (St) No. 380 of 2018 against the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 302
read with 34 of IPC.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
15b. cri appa 55418.doc
3. In view of the averments made in the application and in
the interest of justice, the delay is hereby condoned.
4. The application is allowed in the above terms.
[ M.S. SONAK, J ] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay is permissible in preferring a conditional茎刑 appeal under Section 302 read with 34 of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Zumbarya Kale @ Bapu
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
