Criminal application filed for condonation of delay in filing a criminal appeal. The High Court, hearing the applicant and the State, condoned the delay based on reasons stated in the application and disposed of the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-APPA-386-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.224 OF 2017
KIRAN PANDURANG SOLANKI AND ANR. )...APPLICANTS
V/s.
TATOBA BALU LOHAR – since deceased ) NARAYAN TATOBA LOHAR AND ORS. )...RESPONDENTS
Mr.Saurabh Oka, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 6th APRIL 2018
P.C. :
1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the criminal appeal.
2 Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant. None appeared for respondents except respondent no.17 – the State of Maharashtra.
avk 1/2
8-APPA-386-2017.doc
3 Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant as well as the learned APP. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal appeal is condonable?
By what extent is the application disposed of?
KIRAN PANDURANG SOLANKI AND ANR.
TATOBA BALU LOHAR – since deceased
NARAYAN TATOBA LOHAR AND ORS.
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
