Baban Devji Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal application was not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicant and was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-APPA-377-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.833 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.55 OF 2015
BABAN DEVJI RATHOD
)...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 3rd DECEMBER 2018
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, submits that he is not pressing the instant application.
The same is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 1/1
Baban Devji Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court