A criminal application filed for condonation of delay in lodging an appeal was allowed. The court accepted penury and lack of earlier legal assistance as sufficient grounds.
The application for condonation of delay was allowed; the delay in lodging the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sr.12.appa.348.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.348 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.199 OF 2017
| Kiran Gorakshnath Jadhav | ... | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| V/s. | ||
| State of Maharashtra | ... | Respondent |
None for the applicant.
Mr.S.V. Gavand, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 27th FEBRUARY 2018.
P.C. :
1/2
Vina k
sr.12.appa.348.2017
:: ORDER ::
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
Vina k
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal was condonable due to penury and lack of proper representation.
Kiran Gorakshnath Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
