Jairam S/O Murlidhar Gavali v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-APPA-252-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.252 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.742 OF 2015
JAIRAM S/o.MURLIDHAR GAVALI )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
None for the Applicant.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 2nd APRIL 2018
P.C. :
1 On 6th March 2018 this court had adjourned the
instant application in order to enable the learned Advocate for the applicant/original accused to satisfy this court regarding maintainability of the instant application.
2 This application, which was filed in the year 2016, is being repeatedly adjourned at the instance of the learned
avk 1/2
16-APPA-252-2016.doc
Advocate for the applicant. Today, none appeared for the
applicant/accused when the application is called out for hearing.
3 In this view of the matter, the application is rejected
for want of prosecution.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
Jairam S/o. Murlidhar Gvali
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court