This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(6)APPANo.18982018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1898 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.453 OF 2015
Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 30th NOVEMBER 2018.
P.C. :
2 This is an application for early hearing of the appeal challenging the conviction and resultant sentence imposed on the applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3 The appellant is already on bail. This Court is hearing the appeals in which appellants/accused are in jail for a considerable period as per the directions in the Judgment of the
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(6)APPANo.18982018.doc
Honourable Apex Court in the matter of Hussain & Anr. v. Union of India1 .
(A.M.BADAR J.)
1 2017 (5) SCC 702.
2/2
Gaikwad RD
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for early hearing is maintainable when the applicant is already on bail.
Whether the High Court should grant early hearing of an appeal challenging conviction and sentence where the appellant is on bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hussain & Anr. v. Union of IndiaReferred¶14
Hussain & Anr. v. Union of India
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
