Sanjay Mahendru v. Rashmikant Vinodchandra Shah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(8)APPANo.18552018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1855 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.385 OF 2017
Sanjay Mahendru
... Applicant
V/s.
Rashmikant Vinodchandra Shah & Anr. ... Respondents
None for the Applicant. Mr.Yashpal M. Thakur, Advocate for the Respondent No.1/original Appellant.
Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 26th NOVEMBER 2018.
P.C. :
1 None for the applicant/original respondent, when the application is called out for hearing.
2 Shri.Thakur, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/original appellant submits that the appeal is not ripe for final hearing as Record and Proceedings are not yet transmitted to this Court.
3 The application is rejected for want of prosecution.
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Sanjay Mahendru
Rashmikant Vinodchandra Shah & Anr.
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court