Umesh Uttam Parab v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
In bail modification proceedings, the High Court at Bombay deleted a condition requiring the applicant to report to the Sessions Court at Sindhudurg every six months, citing financial hardship, distance from residence, and the dissolution of his marriage through divorce.
What did the court decide?
Condition No. (iii) of the order dated 18th June 2013, requiring periodic attendance at the Sessions Court at Sindhudurg, was deleted.
What the court decided
sr.27.appa.174.2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.894 OF 2012
Umesh Uttam Parab ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Ms.Ayesha M. Pinto i/b.Mr.Yashodhan Gavankar for the applicant. Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 22nd FEBRUARY 2018.
P.C. :
- This is an application for modification of condition imposed by this court vide order dated 18th June 2013 passed in Criminal Application No.1313 of 2012 while suspending the sentence and releasing the applicant on bail during the pendency of appeal filed by him.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail condition requiring periodic reporting to a distant Sessions Court should be relaxed given financial hardship and dissolution of marriage.
Whether the related offence of cruelty under Section 498A of IPC affects the necessity of the reporting condition.
Whether deletion of the reporting condition is appropriate in light of the applicant's residence and broken marital tie.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Umesh Uttam Parab
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
A.M. Badar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court